June 19, 2013

J Lo’s Sex Tapes Problem Won’t go Away

Ex-husband has crotch shots he wants you to see   

*Uh oh, J.Lo is on front-street with some dirty, dirty sex tapes. The singer/actress filed an injunction against her ex-husband, Ojai Noa, from making public some very, very intimate videotapes of the two of them, reports Radar Online.

The tapes supposedly contain over 21 hours of sex and graphic images, now out there for the public “dogs” to feed off of.

“JLo is riding a scooter in public in Cuba, while talking to the camera and numerous by-standers,” Ed Meyer, a representative for Noa, said. “In Noa’s Home Videos, Lopez displays deviant behavior by consensually exposing her genital area in public.”

According to reports, the images show Jennifer’s va-jay-jay in plain view.

Noa and Lopez wed in 1997; the marriage lasted 11 months.

This is just an addition to the long list of legal battles between the two. Last year the singer prevented her ex from distributing yet another sex tape. But this time she didn’t get her way.

Unfortunately, this news comes out just days after J Lo was declared a national spokesperson for the Boys & Girls Club of America. Yikes!


Love Us? Hate Us? We want to give you a better experience and we need your feedback. Click here.




Articles You May Like

If you have an EURweb account please click here to Login

Comments

  1. Do people who make these tapes ever go back and look at them? If not, what is the point?

  2. nightshift says:

    I bet they’re not that bad, considering how freaky folks are nowadays. The new thing now is to streem it straight to cyberspace.

  3. jbfromptown says:

    She hasn’t been relevant, wants to be relevant, up pops a sex tape. STAGED!

  4. If you willing take part in a sextape with someone the tape is not just your it’s also that other persons so to me that other person should be able to do whatever they want to do with it!!

  5. Jack_Blackmusic says:

    :| The only thing wrong with this “Sex-Tape” is that she’s still singing on it. :roll:

  6. Soooooo… What could we possibly see on this tape we haven’t seen from her already? Big whoop-de-do… Somebody should kill this fool for trying to capitalize off of her fame, but at the same time she should have known better and told him to turn off the damn camera. If I were advising her, I’d tell her to join the negotiation process for the tape because it is 50% hers. Why let HIM get all the money off of her name? In FACT, she could ask for more than him because she is the star! If you can’t stop it from coming out, get paid very well for it. It hasn’t hurt any of these other nobodies that became somebodies by doing these tapes (Karrine Steffans, Kim Kardashian, Pamela Anderson, Paris Hilton, et al).

  7. Taurusingr says:

    This IS a fkd up, bytch as-s move ‘on dude’s part?, but peeps seem to “not know or have forgotten”…she DOGGED they shyt outta dude, when she “came up”! She divorced due, for NO reason, outta no where, & failed to follw through on some business deals she promised she would after he quite his job & was left “haoling the bag”! So…again…fkd up move n all?, but….that bytch “karma”?, don’t for get…SHYT!

  8. Taurusingr says:

    This IS a fkd up, bytch as-s move ‘on dude’s part?, but peeps seem to “not know or have forgotten”…she DOGGED they shyt outta dude, when she “came up”! She divorced due, for NO reason, outta no where, & failed to follw through on some business deals she promised she would after he quite his job & was left “holding the bag”! So…again…fkd up move n all?, but….that bytch “karma”?, don’t for get…SHYT!

Leave a Reply