*People have been running to their local Whole Foods and other markets packed with organic foods and supposedly healthy products for many years.
The food is significantly more expensive than other produce and meats, but was supposed to be well worth the money…until now.
A study’s results published in the Annals of Internal Medicine journal, blew the roof off of the most important information comparing the two foods, according to the Daily Mail.
I kinda new that already…
This is obviously a paid smear campaign against organic food with the belief that the public is dumb enough to “buy it”. No pun intended
“It was also found in two studies of children “found lower levels of pesticide residues in the urine of those on organic diets, though for all those studied the levels were below allowable safety thresholds.”
What you need to do, is show how much benefit will be derived from these lower levels of pesticides over many years, since we all know that it takes decades for the harm from some of these poisons to manifest themselves.
And as for your “allowable safety thresholds”, what do you think is causing all these cancers, birth defects, hormonal changes and even genetic mutations at rates not seen before we started using pesticides?
And BTW, what about those genetically modified seeds which organic farming strives to eliminate from out diet? Why is that conveniently left out of your study? The potential harm to the environment and our health from these seeds is still unknown by those clueless scientists experimenting with these seeds. Organic foods are free of these seeds, except in cases of contamination from nearby non-organic farms.
This study got Monsanto stamped all over it.