![]() Sat, Jul 4, 2009
|
|||
|
|||
01-16-07 EUR ALL ON ONE PAGE(January 16, 2007)
'DREAMGIRLS' IS GOLDEN: Hudson, Murphy and picture itself win 'Globes'; Whitaker gets one, too. *If you've already seen it, you can't be surprised at the wins for "Dreamgirls" at last night's Golden Globes Awards. The acting honors (and congrats) for the flick went out to Eddie Murphy and big screen newcomer Jennifer Hudson. Murphy took the Golden Globe for Best Supporting Actor and Hudson snagged the statuette for Best Supporting Actress at the 64th annual Golden Globes. The two star in the musical “Dreamgirls.” Of course we'd be on the late freight if we didn't acknowledge that "Dreamgirls" itself won the Golden Globe's Musical or Comedy motion picture category Additionally, Forest Whitaker took best actor as Ugandan dictator Idi Amin in "The Last King of Scotland." With this win, Murphy has finally received a major film honor after 25 years in the business. The actor had been nominated for a Globe honor three times before. On the other hand, “Dreamgirls” marks Hudson’s film debut. "I had always dreamed, but I never ever dreamed this big,” former “American Idol” finalist Hudson said. “This goes far beyond anything I could have ever imagined," said supporting-actress winner Hudson, who dedicated her award to Florence Ballard, one of the singers from the Supremes on which "Dreamgirls" is based. "Wow. I'll be damned," said Murphy, upon accepting his award. With the Golden Globes considered the runner-up to the Academy Awards, the Oscar buzz is only getting louder for the young starlet. As Hollywood's second-biggest film honors, the Globes are something of a dress rehearsal for the Oscars, whose nominations come out Jan. 23. The Oscar ceremony will be on Feb. 25. Nominations for the Oscars closed Saturday, so the outcome of the Globes cannot affect who gets nominated. The diss of the evening came from Justin Timberlake, who, in accepting the Best Original Song award on behalf of Prince for His Royal Baddness' "Song of the Heart" from "Happy Feet" (even though Prince himself can be seen sitting in the audience later in the show), bent his knees to speak UP into the microphone, as if to feign being the height of the Minneapolis superstar. See MORE photos from the Golden Globes at Nikki Dorsett's Players, Haters & Imitators blog HERE. The complete list of winners at Monday's 64th annual Golden Globes presented by the Hollywood Foreign Press Association in Beverly Hills: MOTION PICTURES TELEVISION SPECIAL AWARD
*The children of late R&B legend James Brown have plans to turn his former South Carolina residence into a museum and build a mausoleum on the site for his body. The home would become much like Graceland, the home of the late Elvis Presley, and would create an attraction of Brown fans and followers.
PAULA ABDUL REALITY SHOW COMING TO BRAVO: Plus, was singer drunk during TV interview? You be the judge. 'DREAMGIRLS' WINS FOUR AWARDS FROM B'CAST CRITICS: Hudson, Murphy pick up supporting actor trophies; 'Listen' awarded best song. PHILLY'S WHAT-AM SILENCED FOR GOOD: Famed 'Voice of the African-American' SNOOP, SPIKE TV TEAM FOR DOCUMENTARY: Rapper to make a show on youth crime and prison. SPORTS BITS: Tyson indicted; Strahan's prenup; T.O.'s surgery; Kidd's wife; Blake wins; Nifong gone; Tiger honored. EVENT CALENDAR: AJ Johnson tapped by 'Soft & Beautiful'; Barden celebrates hotel ownership; Babyface at Sundance; Black Enterprise's Legacy Awards.
*Embattled football great O.J. Simpson is defending his unpublished book, ‘If I Did It,’ saying that the chapter that hypothesizes how he would have killed his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ron Goldman, was created from a ghostwriter’s research and that it is not a confession of sorts. "I'm saying it's a fictional creation," Simpson said in a telephone interview according to the Associated Press. "It has so many [factual] holes in it that anybody who knew anything about it would know that I didn't write it." The comments were sparked in part because of a story in Newsweek paraphrasing the chapter, called "The Night in Question." The magazine’s account of the murders, which it claimed comes from an anonymous source, describes Simpson as being angry with his wife and snuck into her Brentwood, CA home through a back gate, carrying a knife to scare her. There, when he confronted Goldman, Nicole rushed at him, fell, and accidentally hit her head on the ground. Goldman and Simpson got into an altercation and "then something went horribly wrong, and I know what happened, but I can't tell you exactly how," Simpson was acquitted of the 1994 murders of his ex-wife and Goldman after a year-long trial. A civil jury later held him liable for the killings. Simpson has always maintained his innocence.
The jazz world took a double whammy over the weekend as Alice Coltrane and Michael Brecker passed away. Both were among my favorites, and like many of others, I'll miss them and the major contributions they've made to the art form. Alice Coltrane was already an accomplished bop pianist when she married John Coltrane in 1965, having played under luminaries such as Barry Harris, Stan Getz, Terry Gibbs and Yusef Lateef. She served as John's pianist in his final year and a half, replacing McCoy Tyner in 1966. Along with former bandmate Pharoah Sanders, she has done the most to carry and even expand JC's vision of spiritual, free-form, Eastern mysticism music that sometimes went well beyond the normal boundaries of what was widely held as being "jazz". She didn't just stick with the piano, but also organ and later, synthesizers. She could also play a mean harp. 1970's Ptah the El Daoud was an early post-John high point for her, which demonstrated that the modal form of jazz championed by her late husband was not quite yet exhausted for ideas. After a 26 year hiatus, Coltrane's 2004 release Translinear Light was a triumphant return for her and showed she didn't lose a single bit of her creative fire. It was a fitting coda to a career that perhaps unfairly got seen too much in her late husband's shadow. Michael Brecker possessed both an unsurpassed technique and an easily recognizable signature sound on the tenor saxophone. His style became a big influence to legions of sax players that followed him, but few of these have approached his level of playing. Michael worked many years in relative obscurity since the late- sixties as a session player in very diverse settings. His exhaustive list of session dates included such big-time artists as Aerosmith, Luther Allison, Chet Baker, Blue Oyster Cult, Cameo, Eric Clapton, James Brown, Pat Metheny, Horace Silver and Yoko Ono. He also served co-lead with trumpet-playing brother Randy for the pioneering jazz- funk outfit The Brecker Brothers, and was a key member in the early fusion band Dreams as well as the eighties fusion supergroup Steps Ahead. When Brecker finally went solo with his self-titled album in 1986, he revealed amazing depth as a composer and the music he crafted for his own records were mostly a very challenging and creative form of fusion deeply rooted in bop. His solo works were also often the best showcases for some head-shaking saxophone performances; the solo that serves as the introduction to "Syzygy" on his self-titled album is nothing short of astonishing. Always looking for new challenges, this seven-time Grammy award winner later experimented with blending bluegrass with jazz, leading an organ quartet and putting his own mark on ballads. His third outing Now You See It, Now You Don't is my personal favorite, as he tackled some of his most interesting material on that album. Tragically, Brecker was diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome Michael was 57 when he died on January 13 from complications of leukemia. Rest in peace, Alice and Michael. And thanks for some great music.
*Legendary hip-hop heroines Yo-Yo and MC Lyte are teaming up for The Day Dream Project, inviting 20 young girls who’d written winning essays to come out for a night at the theater for the play “13.” The project is part of the Let Your Light Shine Youth Foundation, founded by the raptresses, who launched the essay contest titled “If I Ruled the World.” The essay contest is one out of four annual components of the project launched a year ago. The 20 winners were chauffeured by limo party bus to dinner and the theater and were awarded gift bags. For more on the foundation, log onto www.letyourlightshineyouthfoundation.com. *Grammy Award-winning gospel great Donnie McClurkin is receiving another tribute. The gospel maestro will be honored as a “gospel giant: at the upcoming Trumpet Awards on January 22. "It's really surreal. Gospel giants to me are like James Cleveland, Edwin and Walter Hawkins and The Winans. I'm just a minister," McClurkin told JET magazine. "I'm just a singer who does what God calls me to do.” THE BRIDGE: Who’s Your Daddy, Part 2 By Darryl James Yesterday’s single-mother household had support from the village consisting of their own fathers, uncles, brothers and other family members. Today, more single mothers are disconnected from extended family members and typically from their own fathers, which means that if the fathers of their children are not on the scene, there more than likely will be no male figure in the children’s lives. There are very few cases of men simply fathering children and willfully shirking parental obligations. Studies show that even among men who use fatherhood to “express their manhood,” there is a desire to remain involved in the lives of the resulting offspring. Yet, the overwhelming concept of the Absentee Father is of a man who “donates his DNA,” and abandons the child along with all responsibilities. The notion of Black fathers abandoning their children is typically the stereotype that many Americans are comfortable with. And this comfort generally comes without any attention to research. For example, how many people with that comfort would remain comfortable with the fact that there are actually a growing number of single parent households headed by Black fathers? However, the fact remains that the overwhelming majority of children in single parent households are being raised by mothers, frequently in the absence of a father or father figure. There are a number of reasons why fathers are absent from their children’s lives, even though the one that garners the most focus is the man being a proverbial “Deadbeat Dad,” the father who willfully neglects to pay his financial obligations. Some fathers may be absent because they were unprepared for fatherhood and are often unwilling, but have little say once the woman is pregnant. Some fathers may be absent because the mother may not actually know who impregnated her, and other fathers may be absent because their assigned financial responsibility is far above their financial capability. While society seeks to imprison men who fail to pay child support, few focus on the fact that 70% of fathers who are in arrears on child support earn $10,000 a year or less. In short, the majority of men who are being prosecuted for failure to pay often can not pay. And, even if there are attempts to be involved, including sharing the care of the child, purchasing groceries, diapers or other necessities, those attempts are discounted if the assigned financial responsibilities are unmet. The net result when a father is unable to pay, is that he will probably disappear from the child’s life, after either running from the financial burden that he can not carry, or after being jailed for being unable to shoulder the financial burden. These are the two most prominent results when Daddy can not pay, and while a great portion of society is comfortable with these results, there are some dire consequences of not having fathers in the lives of children. There are a handful of pieces written about the consequences of absentee fathers, but generally the focus is on the male child. However, there are some very serious issues faced by fatherless females today, which stem from low self-esteem and very poor socialization with positive male role models in their lives as young girls. These issues include fleeting and unstable love relationships with men, early experimentation with sex, increased out of wedlock childbirth and lower self-esteem. These issues must be addressed. Increased absentee fathers result in increased poverty for the children. Fifty-one percent of the children raised by unmarried mothers are raised in poverty, while only seven percent of children in a marriage are poor. Even marriage after the child is born decreases poverty for the child by more than half. That poverty, which typically includes Welfare dependence, has that dependence sustained through the child’s minority years in 50% of the cases, while children in married households are only on Welfare 3% of the time until adulthood. Again, marriage after the child is born decreases Welfare dependence by more than half, while divorce will only increase Welfare dependence to 13%. Children raised in single parent homes are more likely to have retarded cognitive development, lower educational achievement, increased behavioral problems, lower impulse control and increased emotional disturbances. Those children are also more likely to engage in criminal activity. A summary from the National Institute of Child Health and Development found that inner city Black male children in households at or below poverty with little or no fatherhood involvement had lower mental development and decreased cognitive development. They also were more prone to difficulties with self control, impulse control and Attention Deficit Disorder. Project TALENT, a federal survey, found that children born outside of marriage were more likely to become unwed parents themselves. Those children have a higher likelihood of becoming single parents because they are experiencing earlier sexual activity and few, if any models of parenting partnerships and/or marriage. They are also more likely to end up on Welfare as single parents. According to The National Health Interview Survey of Child Health, children of unwed parents have greater behavioral and emotional problems than children of married parents. A 1988 study by the University of Illinois showed that a boy’s educational achievements are diminished the longer he spends in a single parent home. In 1988, a study of eleven thousand people showed a dramatic association between rates of violent crime and children from single parent households between the ages of 12 and 20. The study underscored the fact that neither poverty alone, nor race alone can be associated with high crime rates. And, data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, reveals that young Black men raised in homes lead by a single mother are twice as likely to engage in criminal activities as those from two parent homes. Society at large and the Black community in specific would do well to understand the importance of the father’s role in child rearing, focusing on more important aspects such as time spent on a regular basis than simple assignment of financial responsibility. Even if all the fathers pay, who will be there to provide male role models for the children? Am I making excuses for Absentee Fathers? Not hardly. What I am doing is underscoring the very real fact that focusing on financial child support has done little to increase the quality of life for the throngs of young boys and girls who are growing up without male influence. More men have been jailed for child support, but that has not resulted in more men in the lives of those children or even more non-welfare support for the children, which means, quite frankly, that the Child Support Industry has failed. Absentee fathers are not the only deadbeats. Next Week: Who’s a Deadbeat? Darryl James is an award-winning author who is now a filmmaker. His first mini-movie, “Crack,” was released in March of this year. James’ latest book, “Bridging The Black Gender Gap,” is the basis of his lectures and seminars. Previous installments of this column can now be viewed at www.bridgecolumn.com. James can be reached at djames@theblackgendergap.com.
*The celebration of the federal King holiday brings about a whole host of conflicts and convolutions. This year was no different. The only man to have a federal holiday named in his honor in the 20th century (that wasn't a President), the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. lost his life in a perpetual struggle to bring about freedom, justice and equality to the masses of people in this country. The fight for social justice in America very quickly turned to a recognition of the economic disparities that subjugated Blacks and others in a way that compromised their freedom and quality of life. King's last commitment to the struggle (besides ending the Vietnam war) was to eradicate poverty in the most affluent nation in the history of the world. King did not believe it was right that one would speak out on social injustice, but remain silent on the questions of the war and poverty. Dr. King's sense of rightness was based on his sense of justice. King knew that the right to stand for right couldn't be a relative engagement. Right had to be right because in its rightness, justice would be evident. The fight for economic justice today has become a relative engagement. Forty years later, we see greater disparities in wages and wealth than when King was living. Those who claim to support King's legacy need to finish King's last fight, ending poverty. We need another Poor People's Campaign. The days leading up to the King holiday, every year, are filled with events that romanticize the period that was the most volatile (outside of the Civil War) in the nation's history. It is supposed to be a period of retrospection, a period of rededication to the life and principles of Dr. King. But most times it is an engagement in relativism of how people and certain groups try to fit their relative rightness into the King paradigm. In the same day, I was on a conference call with people trying to plan an honest dialogue between the African American and Latino communities without addressing the impact the immigrant influx has on the undermining of work and wages in the black community. That evening, I was on a panel where the topic was supposed to be, "King: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow," but quickly evolved into a debate as to whether gay's rights are civil rights. In both instances relative logic was being used to advocate for human injustices that conflict with social standards. While social and economic discriminations are real within both populations, to frame them in the King paradigm is a reach for both, and not prevalent to the extent of race and gender discrimination in America for which civil rights were constructed. The poverty question came up in both dialogues and while a sub-context in both conversations, the realities of economic subjugation were evidenced in both arguments as impacting both populations. The poverty question is a justice question, not a circumstantial "rightness" question like gay and immigration rights where folk can hide sexuality or citizenship or disclose it selectively when they want to pursue the rights, privileges and benefits of citizenship and marriage. Blacks are always black, women are always women, and the poor always poor. The difference between the fight for right and justice is that what is right may not always be just, but what is just is always right. The post-King society has lost sight of this, and the relativity of rightness has taken over society, where justice is nowhere to be found. Everybody is right and nobody is wrong anymore. That's why President Bush can still believe he's right to send 21,000 additional troops to Iraq and spend hundreds of million more dollars in the face of overwhelming public opposition. Yet, the poverty question can't be raised in any realm of American society without the ideologues twisting the issue. King understood this relationship between unbridled militarism and unaddressed poverty. At the same time King was speaking out against the war, he was planning a campaign to address poverty. In what would end up being King's last fight, a Poor People's Campaign was planned to coincide with the 1968 Presidential Election and major party conventions to highlight the issue of economic injustice in America. The campaign was informally launched as King went to Memphis, Tennessee to show solidarity with striking sanitation workers whose fight was not only about livable wages but dignity in their effort to make an honest living. The mantra of the strike was simply, I Am A Man. While King didn't live to see the Poor People's campaign, and Resurrection City went forth in a largely symbolic measure, the question of poverty went ignored and unaddressed for the remainder of the 20th Century. Now the poverty question is back on the front burner of the nation's conscience, and like war, is being dealt with in a relative manner. It is right to speak of eradicating poverty, but little is being done about poverty in a way that brings the poor any real justice. In the meantime, America is doing more to bring about democracy in Iraq than it is doing to bring about democracy in the urban cities of America. With the money we've spent in Iraq, most of the social ills of the top 50 urban cities in America could have been addressed in a significant way. It is not right, nor is it just to continue to ignore poverty in the way America does. During this last King week, a young labor leader out of Los Angeles, Tyrone Freeman, president of one of the largest SEIU locals, is calling another Poor Peoples Campaign, to make poverty a campaign issue in the upcoming 2008 presidential election. In Los Angeles, forty percent of the nation's second largest city live at or below the poverty line, making them eligible for pubic assistance. But there is no assistance to be found, and nobody has the integrity to address the question. We need another Poor People's Campaign to refocus this nation on decent wages and a livable quality of life for all. Anthony Asadullah Samad is a national columnist, managing director of the Urban Issues Forum (www.urbanissuesforum.com) and author of the upcoming book, Saving The Race: Empowerment Through Wisdom. He can be reached at www.AnthonySamad.com
Some might ask why should they care? They’ve got the gold. And he who’s got the gold makes the rules. America was built on free slave labor. Since the Emancipation Proclamation put an end to that, American business owners have spent the last 140 years trying to figure out how to pay workers as little in compensation as possible. Therein lies the minimum wage. So, even if it’s raised to $7.25/hour that still won’t be enough. That’s the bad news. But the same rules rich people use to get rich, minimum wage earners can use to keep more of their money. They must learn the rules of the game. That’s the good news. Rule number one: Business ownership is the American way. Whether it’s a product or a service, you’ve got to sell something that people are willing to buy. The part-time business income will supplement the money from your full-time job. That leads me to rule number tw Even if you don’t earn a lot of money from sells in your business, the IRS will allow you as a business owner to write off on your taxes things like gas and mileage on your car, restaurant meals and out-of-town trips. That means the money you spend on everyday expenses comes back to you in a bigger tax return. Don’t take my word for it and don’t ask know-it-all Joe. Go to http://www.irs.gov and look at the Schedule C tax form. Most of the legal loopholes used by business owners to keep their money can be found in the IRS tax code. You can use the same loopholes if you have a business. Even if you earn a six-figure income on a job, the IRS legally will take up to thirty-nine percent of your money in income taxes. The more you make the more they take. You don’t have to have a storefront office. You can start in your garage or the spare room in your house. You just need a legal hustle, a good tax advisor and the determination to make it happen. Just as dogs bark and babies cry, nature dictates that most rich people only care about rich people stuff. No matter how many times Congress raises the minimum wage, nobody’s going to legislate you out of poverty. Poverty starts as a state of mind.
The life of a teacher can be characterized as an exercise in holding a conversation with a schizophrenic on a daily basis. Imagine if you will a person with 150 different personalities, each one requiring something different and unique. Sometimes the personality is wild and crazy. Other times it is laidback with a let’s chill attitude. However, the one personality I enjoy the most is the studious neurotic who stresses over the smallest details. No matter which personality I encounter, I love them all and look forward to exercising my mental fortitude, stamina and comic genius to deal with whatever comes my way in the classroom I use to call home 5 days a week. Follow these basics tips and you will have your teacher eating out of your hand or at least your plate. For those academic soldiers who walk through the doors of a school building each and every day, we salute your dedication to your student’s success and know that the profession is often a labor of love. To those students who sit in our classrooms, start developing the habit of putting yourself in your Teacher’s shoes. Small things such as a small thank you, good attitude and honest behavior go a long way in endearing your teacher to you. Try this on for size, “Thank you Mr. or Mrs. X that was a great lesson today”. Tip #2: “My Teacher Doesn’t Like Me!” We’ve all heard students complain that their teacher must hate them due to some reason or another. Teachers are professionals and should never make personal attacks or take unnecessary actions against a student. Many times the teacher is unaware that a student feels neglected or ignored. Share your feelings and concerns with your teacher. Avoid accusing the teacher. Instead begin the conversation with “I would like to participate in your class more. Do you have any advice on how I can be more involved during class?” You’d be surprised at how many brownie points you’ll get just by showing your teacher you are willing to partner with them in helping you achieve your personal and academic goals. Tip #3: Asking for Extra Help One of the biggest frustrations of a teacher is giving a test and having half of the class fail because they did not understand the material. Avoid being one of the students who do not make the grade by nipping your confusion on a particular concept, subject or assignment in the bud. Many teachers willingly offer after-school or lunch time tutorial help for students who are struggling in their classes. It is your responsibility to take advantage of these services. Complaints that you didn’t get a good grade on the test because the material was too difficult may fall on deaf ears if you haven’t taken the extra step of asking for help. A simple discussion with your teacher to let him or her know that you are having problems grasping the material will usually yield a helping hand. Tip #4: Be on Time Showing up to class late is a sure fire way to get points taken off your grade. Since the passing period between classes is usually 10 minutes or less use your time wisely to get from one class to another. It is fine to say hello to your peers as you go from one class to the next; we all know that the high school years can be a very social time in your life. However, being social should not prevent you from making it to class on time. If a class is located on the other end of the campus consider power-walking to the class. Not only will you make it to class on-time, you will also get your cardiovascular heart rate going. Tip #5: Disputing a Grade Keeping in mind that Teachers Are People Too also means remembering the fact that they are not above making mistakes. During the course of grading papers usually at 12 midnight, miscalculations can occur. Getting your teacher to give you those extra points without escalating the issue is all about your approach. Simply point out the error to the teacher in a non-confrontational manner. Teachers often complain that students immediately go on the offensive when attempting to make a point. Calm and cool is the best way to approach any situation. Not only do you get better results, it demonstrates your ability to show your maturity and is another step toward strengthening the student/teacher partnership. Partnerships are based on creating relationships of give and take. Students who begin building a strong partnership with their teachers now will find it much easier to approach them for help when the college application season rolls around. Each week I’ll write about college-centric topics that are informative, witty, inspirational and above all intended to give you “The Edge”. Until then…Carpe Diem! Regina Thomas is the founder of College Admissions Counselors; a private, one-on-one admissions coaching service that assists high school students and working professionals with the college application process. She has a Master of Education Degree from Harvard University and a Bachelor of Arts in Mass Communications from the University of California, Berkeley. Regina is happy to answer your college related questions. Send your inquiries to regina@yourcollegeworld.com.
Speak Out
Currently, 0 comments have been made on this story.
|
... |
||
| Back to Top | |||