Wednesday, April 24, 2024

‘Leaving Neverland’ Director Responds to Criticism; Calls Michael Jackson ‘Very Precious Asset’

2019 Sundance Film Festival - 'Leaving Neverland' Premiere
Director Dan Reed speaks onstage during the “Leaving Neverland” Premiere during the 2019 Sundance Film Festival at Egyptian Theatre on January 25, 2019 in Park City, Utah.
(Jan. 24, 2019 – Source: Jerod Harris/Getty Images North America)

*The director of the controversial Michael Jackson documentary “Leaving Neverland” has responded to the backlash from the estate of the late King of Pop.

The doc debuted at Sundance Film Festival last week, and focuses on Wade Robson and James Safechuck, who both allege they were molested by the music icon as children.

As reported by New Musical Express, Jackson’s estate described the film as a “public lynching.”

“Michael always turned the other cheek, and we have always turned the other cheek when people have gone after members of our family – that is the Jackson way,” their statement to the Associated Press read. “But we can’t just stand by while this public lynching goes on … Michael is not here to defend himself, otherwise these allegations would not have been made.”

OTHER NEWS YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED: SNL Spoofs Soulja Boy’s ‘Breakfast Club’ Interview/Drake Diss [WATCH]

Director Dan Reed has now responded to the criticism that his project is a “tabloid character assassination,” noting that “Leaving Neverland” is “a four-hour documentary by an experienced documentarian with a long track record in investigation and telling complex stories and this is a complex story,” he told the Hollywood Reporter.
“I’d say it’s beyond doubt a documentary. Anyone with any knowledge of that form would recognize a documentary. A four-hour piece, is that a tabloid? I didn’t characterize Jackson at all in the film — I think if you watch it you’ll have noticed that it’s a story about these two families and Jackson is an element of that story.
“But I don’t seek to characterize him at all. I don’t comment on Jackson. It’s not a film about Michael. … The film itself is an account of sexual abuse, how sexual abuse happens and then how the consequences play out later in life.“
Reed also described the singer as a “very precious asset” so he understands the family’s position of wanting to protect Jackson’s image.

“They have a very precious asset to protect,” he added “Every time a song plays, a cash register goes ‘ka-ching.’ It doesn’t surprise me that they’ve come out fighting in defense of their asset.”
Reed said both Robson and Safechuck “were not paid in any way, directly, indirectly.”
“The family were not enumerated. There was nothing. No compensation in any form whatsoever. I think that’s an important thing to establish,” he added.
“The #MeToo era began during the making of the film, and there’s been a sea change in how we regard the victims of sexual assault, and I’m hoping that this film will deepen that and widen it to boys and men, victims of child sexual abuse. Also I’m hoping it’ll educate people as to how child sexual abuse happens.”
Meanwhile, Jackson’s nephew Taj has launched a crowdfunder to raise money for his own documentary that will challenge the allegations against the music legend.

We Publish News 24/7. Don’t Miss A Story. Click HERE to SUBSCRIBE to Our Newsletter Now!

YOU MAY LIKE

SEARCH

- Advertisement -

TRENDING